What a busy week! For those who are new here or didn’t read my last couple of posts, I am spiralling Grade 10 Applied Math (MFM2P in Ontario) for the first time. (I am also teaching this course for the first time in my career.) I have a new classroom with vertical chalkboards on most of the walls, plus some portable vertical whiteboards. My school is one of four “early start” schools in my board, which means we start a week before Labour Day (and we get a week off in late October/early November). Here’s how my first day went down:
Originally I used Kyle Pearce’s spiralling guide to create my Spiralled Long Range Plans. Later in August, I was at a board workshop, and I met a history teacher in my board who told me that there was a school a few minutes away from mine that was doing, some cool new thing in their math department that I might be interested in, he thinks they called it… “spiralling”? I got the department head’s email and got in touch with him. The department head told me that they spiralled their courses by spending 4 days teaching, with the Friday being review and a quiz. Then on Monday they would start a new strand. I really liked the idea of having a routine that students can rely on so that if they are frustrated or struggling with one concept, they know that they can start fresh on Monday with a new topic. Hopefully the spiralling and constant review will help students remember the concepts for the exam as well. I updated my long range plans to fit this model a bit better (more or less).
My updated Long Range Plans are here. My plan is to continue to add links to resources for each topic throughout the semester. (Eventually I will probably fix up a nice version in Google Sheets, but I work best with a calendar-type LRP, so sticking with that for now.) Review days that seem random are days when I will be away.
The First Day
There were a lot of things I wanted to do on the first day and I knew I wouldn’t have time for all of them, so I made a list of everything I wanted to do and then chose the most important ones. Talking Points is a favourite of mine that I’ve used in all of my math classes for the past 2 years. I think it helps establish my classroom norms about growth mindset in math, but this year I decided to change things up a bit. I really hope I get a chance to squeeze in a short lesson about growth mindset later sometime this month. Here’s what I did instead:
I started the class with this warm up from Which One Doesn’t Belong:
I had students discuss it at their tables, then I had each student vote on which number didn’t belong, and explain why. Most of the students agreed that 43 didn’t belong, either because it was prime or because it wasn’t a perfect square (they needed some help with the correct mathematical terminology). The students who didn’t choose 43 were feeling a bit uneasy. I then told the students to choose another number and tell me why it didn’t belong. I tried to enforce the idea that there is no wrong answer here. One student pointed out that the digits of 16, 25 and 43 all add up to 7, but 9 doesn’t, which I had never noticed before.
I then took attendance. A lot of teachers on Twitter suggested forgoing all of the typical “first day” syllabus stuff, but I felt that establishing my expectations and possible consequences was important to do from day 1. I found this article about classroom management from Cult of Pedagogy to be really helpful. One of the strongest points in the article was that for 90% of students, making your class engaging and interesting for them will help deter any classroom management challenges. But for those 10%, you need to have clear expectations and consequences so that students know exactly what is expected of them. As the article recommended, after going over the serious stuff, I told my students that all that being said, I plan to do a lot of fun things this year and I’m looking forward to getting to know them.
I then jumped into Jon Orr’s game of NIM:
The students loved this. I challenged the class to play against me, and then we worked out some of the mechanics of the game. I talked about why I chose to play this game and how it relates to learning math.
Then we did another activity I got from Jon Orr, Graphing your Subjects. We started with the first quadrant only graphing as a review, and went over success criteria for graphing.
Finally, it seems like every teacher swears by Sara Van Der Werf’s name tents. I wasn’t sure if the kids would go for it in high school, but I figured I’d give it a try this semester, and if it doesn’t work, I won’t do it again. Although some students didn’t take them seriously, I found they were very effective for most. Some students told me things that I never would have known otherwise about how they felt about the lesson, questions they had that they didn’t want to ask out loud, things like that. I don’t know if I would do them in a Grade 12 class, but they were great for my 2Ps and my Grade 10 open computer engineering class.
I was also planning to have students fill out a short survey and join our Google Classroom, but we ran out of time, so I decided to end there and do the rest tomorrow. Over the next few days, I continued to introduce a bit of syllabus-type information each day for the rest of the week (materials to bring to class, when to get extra help, etc).
Overall, I think day 1 went well, and I would definitely do all of the activities again. Many thanks as always to all of the teachers whose ideas and activities I used.
If you have any feedback for me, hit up the comments! Welcome back to school!